SCM for SDVs
SCM4SDVs is a lightweight, adaptive supply chain model designed for software-defined vehicles (SDVs). It removes inefficiencies, reduces dependencies on rigid release cycles, and aligns supply logistics with software-first development.
Core Principles of SCM4SDVs
HW/SW Unbundling
Software and hardware evolve independently with modular integration points.
Suppliers provide pre-validated digital twins of hardware, enabling early software development.
Agile Contracts & Fewer Fixed Requirements
Suppliers commit to capability-based contracts, not just fixed deliveries.
Software updates and hardware iterations occur asynchronously with fewer, more flexible requirement checkpoints.
Just-in-Time SW/HW Integration
Software development aligns with virtual hardware before physical hardware is even shipped.
Cloud-based pre-integration ensures readiness before final assembly.
Event-Driven, Demand-Synchronized Logistics
Real-time telemetry from SDV production lines triggers dynamic material flow.
Predictive analytics pre-orders components based on software-defined feature demand.
Lean Validation & Digital Homologation
Continuous compliance checks digitally verify regulatory conformity.
Automated homologation pipelines reduce time-to-market for software-defined components.
SCM4SDVs in Action:
✅ Tier 1 supplies digital twins of ECUs before hardware ships. ✅ OTA-ready software releases allow continuous updates, independent of hardware refresh cycles. ✅ Contracts focus on "capability delivery" instead of rigid requirements. ✅ Reduced requirement checkpoints and homologation bottlenecks enable software-defined flexibility.
SCM4SDVs optimizes SDV supply chains by making them modular, software-driven, and real-time adaptive—moving beyond traditional linear automotive logistics.
Five Key Strategies
OEMs can minimize managed requirements by outsourcing system responsibility to suppliers, enforcing standardized interfaces, leveraging pre-certified components, adopting simulation-driven validation, and utilizing third-party compliance services.
1. Black-Box Outsourcing (Supplier-Owned Responsibility)
Concept: Shift full responsibility for specific systems or components to a Tier 1 supplier, treating them as a black box where you only define high-level requirements and expected performance outcomes.
How It Works:
The supplier provides a fully developed, validated, and homologated system.
The supplier is contractually required to meet all functional, safety, and regulatory standards.
OEM only manages interface requirements and system integration.
Example:
Instead of managing 80,000 airbag system requirements, OEM defines:
Deployment speed
Crash test compliance (UNECE, FMVSS)
Electrical interface
The supplier handles the rest.
Impact on Supplier Relations:
Requires strong trust and contractual oversight.
OEM audits supplier processes instead of managing detailed requirements.
Increases reliance on Tier 1 suppliers’ engineering expertise.
✅ Pros: Low internal complexity, fast time-to-market. ❌ Cons: Less control over deep technical details and customizations.
2. Standardized Interfaces & Modularity
Concept: Define clear, standardized interfaces that allow suppliers to develop components independently, reducing the number of requirements managed at the OEM level.
How It Works:
OEM defines hardware and software interfaces but not the internal logic of components.
Suppliers deliver pre-certified modules that integrate seamlessly.
Use industry standards to avoid custom requirement sets.
Example:
Software-defined vehicles (SDVs) can use COVESA VSS for software interfaces, allowing plug-and-play ECUs.
AUTOSAR-based ECUs standardize communication between vehicle domains.
Battery systems following standardized charging interfaces (ISO 15118).
Impact on Supplier Relations:
Encourages competition among suppliers (plug-and-play components).
Requires OEM enforcement of interface specifications.
Reduces long-term supplier lock-in.
✅ Pros: Highly scalable, allows multiple supplier options. ❌ Cons: Requires strong interface governance.
3. Pre-Certified & Homologation-Ready Systems
Concept: Work with suppliers who deliver components and systems that are already pre-tested and pre-certified for regulatory compliance.
How It Works:
OEM specifies only regulatory requirements and expected performance.
Supplier provides certified solutions with documentation for homologation.
Example:
ADAS system suppliers ensure UNECE R79 (steering), R152 (AEB), and FMVSS compliance before delivery.
Tier 1 suppliers provide ISO 26262 ASIL-D safety cases for ECUs without OEM involvement in every detail.
Impact on Supplier Relations:
Increases supplier responsibility for compliance.
Reduces need for OEM-internal homologation efforts.
Requires legal and contractual frameworks for liability sharing.
✅ Pros: Reduces homologation complexity at OEM level. ❌ Cons: Supplier selection must be rigorous.
4. Virtual Validation & Digital Twin-Based Homologation
Concept: Use simulation, AI, and digital twins to reduce physical testing and requirement documentation.
How It Works:
Define high-level functional requirements and verify them via virtual models instead of manual requirement decomposition.
Suppliers provide simulation-based proof of compliance.
AI-driven requirements management tools suggest and track regulatory changes.
Example:
Using virtual crash testing to verify airbag compliance instead of managing thousands of test conditions manually.
Using AI to auto-map regulatory updates to existing requirement sets.
Impact on Supplier Relations:
Requires suppliers to provide simulation models.
Reduces dependence on physical prototyping.
Shifts verification from physical testing to software validation.
✅ Pros: Reduces test complexity, faster compliance. ❌ Cons: Requires investment in simulation infrastructure.
5. Regulatory Compliance as a Service (RaaS)
Concept: Outsource regulatory tracking, compliance, and homologation documentation to specialized third-party services.
How It Works:
OEM only defines vehicle-level compliance goals.
Third-party experts handle legal interpretation, requirement updates, and certification.
Suppliers deliver pre-certified components validated by these services.
Example:
KPMG, TÜV, or DEKRA handle regulatory approvals.
Third-party AI tools continuously track UNECE, FMVSS, ISO updates.
Impact on Supplier Relations:
Simplifies compliance management for OEMs.
Reduces in-house regulatory tracking needs.
Requires partnerships with homologation experts.
✅ Pros: Reduces complexity of regulatory tracking. ❌ Cons: Adds external dependency.
Summary: Choosing the right approach
Last updated
